|
Flat Panels
Video Projectors Rear-Projection TV Receivers Speakers Disc Players Surround Pre/Pros Amplifiers Accessories Recently Added
Video Displays
Speakers
Sources
Electronics
Accessories Scott Wilkinson Thomas Norton Fred Manteghian Kim Wilson How To Features Audio/Video News Past eNewsletters CES 2008 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 CES 2007 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 CES 2006 Thomas J. Norton Michael Fremer Joel Brinkley Scott Wilkinson Dealer Locator AV Links Contact Us Flatscreen TVs LCD TVs Plasma TVs HDTV AV Receivers Home Theater in a Box Digital Projectors DLP Projectors Video Projectors Surround Sound Dolby 5.1 |
Dynaudio Special 25 & Sub 500 surround speaker system
For two decades now, Danish manufacturer Dynaudio has been known for making superb speakers in small cabinets. No, such designs can't produce the robust bass that larger speakers can musterthat's a simple factor of physics, not of design. But Dynaudio's track record should intrigue anyone interested in buying a compact speaker.
For the May 2001 SGHT, I reviewed a speaker that Dynaudio now describes as a "predecessor product": the Contour 1.3 Mk.II SE. It was an excellent example of what I saw as the hallmark of Dynaudio sound: cool and restrained, but detailed. I liked them so much I bought them. For this surround system, Dynaudio sent me five samples of their latest no-compromise compact speaker, the Special 25. I had a matched set of fronts, rears, and center. Dynaudio writes of the Special 25 with unrestrained superlatives: "The finest compact loudspeaker ever crafted by Dynaudio." A speaker measuring only 16.7 by 8.8 by 13.8 inches but costing $4800/pair had better be very good for anyone to consider using five of them in a home theater. The cost of my review system was $12,000not including the subwoofer. My reference home-theater speaker system, the Infinity Prelude MTS, isat least on paperfar more capable. Each of its two large front towers has a 12-inch powered subwoofer in its base; the center and rear speakers are matched, though they lack subs. That setup cost $12,000 when I bought it, $16,000 now. The comparison may not be as outrageous as it sounds. It's quite a bit more difficult to get superb, nearfull-range sound from a tiny cabinet than from a big one. The former is an art, and if the results are superb, the price is likely to be high. Anyone with lots of room and no family concernsmy situationmight opt for a big MTS system or something similar. But that's not a viable option for many others, for whom a superb small speaker might be valued more highly, and be worth the price.
What They Are
The Special 25's cabinet walls are heavily braced inside with corner blocks and damping plates, and the low end is reflex-loaded by a horn-shaped, rear-facing port. (Foam blocks are included to plug the ports in case the speakers are placed close to a wall.) If you use the Special 25s only for music listening, perhaps you could live without that bottom octave of bass. I do so with my Contour 1.3 Mk.II SEs, which I use in another room, for music only. Sometimes I'm wistful for that deep bass, but I have no room for a subwoofer there. Still, I don't miss the bass as much as I would in my theater. So, for use as a home theater system, a subwoofer is absolutely necessaryand Dynaudio kindly provided a sample of its new Sub 500, a relatively compact sub with a 12-inch woofer and a 250W internal amp. The Sub 500's $1900 cost pushes the total system price to $13,900.
Where They Went
For music, my Sony DVP-NS999ES DVD/SACD/CD player crossed over the Special 25s to the Sub 500 at 80Hz. For movie soundtracks, my Lexicon MC 12B (v.3) preamp-processor performed the same function at the same frequency. The Special 25s were placed atop the subwoofer bases of my front Infinity speakers, and on stands immediately below my rear surrounds. I moved the Infinity center-channel speaker from its shelf near the floor and replaced it with a Special 25. The Dynaudios thus were in almost exactly the same spots as the Infinityspositions for which my system is finely tuned.
What They Did
The Special 25s put on a credible performance. My first impression was that the bass was tight, wonderfully articulated, even gutsy. But I'd played this disc a few times before, and knew that its lowest tones were missing. Still, it was amazing to look at these little speakers and believe that the strong bass I was hearing was coming from such small boxes. But usually, when I review a speaker system, I try not to listen to SACDs firstit just prejudices my view of standard CDs. So after the Hohner Ensemble had finished bashing away, I moved to a mix of CDs. First up was some hard rock, The Best of Wishbone Ash (MCA 11620), from a group known for long, improvised solos on electric guitarmusic I enjoyed when I was in college. Through the Dynaudio system, the guitars on "The Pilgrim" were brassy and overwrought, so forward that the sound was harsh and unpleasant. This was surprisingI'd never noticed this in previous playings of this disc. I immediately took the disc upstairs and played it in my music room with the Dynaudio Contour 1.3 Mk.II SEs, which I know to be patently cool, laid-back speakers. When I played "The Pilgrim" there, the same guitar riff was a bit forward and bright, but not at all unpleasant. Quite a contrast. This is just the sort of brassiness that can indicate that a speaker has not yet been properly broken in. Dynaudio had broken in the Special 25s for several days before sending them to me, but I decided maybe that hadn't been enough. I put several different discs on Repeat play and let the speakers cook for another 60 hours (though not at super-high volumesnot possible in my house), then played "The Pilgrim" again. The brassiness was damped down a bit but was still quite pronounced, still unnatural. Maybe after many weeks of burn-in it would diminish even more, but I have no way of knowing.
While I had issues with the midrange, the high end positively sparkled, airy and grain-free. And consistently, the speakers provided a full, well-defined low end that was surprising for their size. I plugged in the Sub 500 and played some of the same music again, including Far More Drums. Suddenly the music had a floor and a heft it had lacked before. That sub was convincing. But when I measured it with test tones, I found significant peaks at certain frequencies, particularly at 56Hz, where my meter registered 96dB compared to 8384dB over most of the rest of the range. With test tones and movie soundtracks, the Sub 500 boomed at that frequency, losing all sense of precise definition. I'm not going to draw conclusions from this; the problem could be a function of the Sub 500's placement and/or my room. Dynaudio does provide a nice little remote control that allows the user to adjust from the listening position several of the Sub 500's parametersthough none that seemed to affect the boom noted above. I watched several movies, such as the second and third in the Matrix series, Reloaded and Revolutions. Both have thrumming bass tones that seem to be omnipresent and give the movies a thrilling floor that the Sub 500 was able to render without quibble or complaint. Nothing was missing. Revolutions, particularly, has a variety of scenes in which the midrangebeyond the portrayals of human voicesmatters. The squid-like Sentinels emit squeaks and tones, machines hum, people sing. All of this was convincing through the Special 25saccompanied by the Sub 500, these little speakers offered a broad, deep soundstage. Had I walked into a darkened room and sat down to watch this movie, I would have been shocked to see, when the lights came up, that I'd been listening to such small speakers.
What It All Means
But even with my reservations, and even at this price, the Dynaudio Special 25 (with the accompanying Sub 500) is a little wonder. If you're looking for a compact but impressive home theater system, look here.
Article Continues: Specifications »
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Wishbone Ash proved to be the demon for these speakers. I played other CDs, including Keith Jarrett's The Köln Concert (ECM 1064/65), a long, liquid piano solothere, the same midrange sounded bloated and overfull, though never harsh. Other CDs demonstrated more or less of this same midrange trait.