|
Flat Panels
Video Projectors Rear-Projection TV Receivers Speakers Disc Players Surround Pre/Pros Amplifiers Accessories Recently Added
Video Displays
Speakers
Sources
Electronics
Accessories Scott Wilkinson Thomas Norton Fred Manteghian Kim Wilson How To Features Audio/Video News Past eNewsletters CEDIA 2008 CES 2008 CEDIA 2007 HE 2007 CES 2007 CEDIA 2006 HE 2006 CES 2006 Thomas J. Norton Michael Fremer Joel Brinkley Scott Wilkinson Dealer Locator AV Links Contact Us Flatscreen TVs LCD TVs Plasma TVs HDTV AV Receivers Home Theater in a Box Digital Projectors DLP Projectors Video Projectors Surround Sound Dolby 5.1 |
The Revel Concerta F12 Surround Sound Speaker System:
Not surprisingly, the F12 towers have been voiced to sound somewhat warmer, less brash and more refined than the Beta 50s, but not to the point where the resemblance was masked. Now that I know that the Beta 50s showed a significant valley at around 650Hz that the ear can interpret as a peak where the valley rises sharply at 1K, I will chance the prediction that the F12 will exhibit a somewhat smoother response where the Beta 50 dipped. What have I got to lose by making such a prediction but my credibility? (UAV reviewers don't see the measurements before sending in their reviews, so I haven't yet seen the Revel results. But I have, of course, now seen the measurements on the Betas.) That leaves the small, two-way, stand-mounted M12s. As the Beta system measurements demonstrate, the tweeter's on-axis response is impressively smooth, so firing them directly at the listening position resulted in surround effects that were more direct (and sometimes more startling) without becoming obtrusive, and without the speakers making their locations obvious. That said, the dipole/bipole Revel S12 would be my choice, for its ability to throw a larger, more enveloping and more convincing rear soundfieldone that would integrate better with the front trio.
While reviewing Outlaw Audio's RR 2150 Stereo RetroReceiver for Stereophile I used it to drive the M12s, which I moved to the front of the room. This combination makes a nice, compact two-way stereo system, capable of response into the 40Hz range. Using the receiver's mild bass boost EQ feature, enhanced the overall picture and produced a supple, pleasing foundation that fooled me into thinking I was hearing beyond the speaker's low frequency limitations. Crossed over to a subwoofer using the receiver's built in bass management system (based upon the company's outboard ICBM system) produced a full range system that was laughably good for around $1650. Just don't expect it to play too loud or produce the last word in low-level resolution or dynamics.
Putting It All Together in 5.2
If you go back and read my review of the Infinity system (so easy to do with web publishing!) you'll have a very good idea of how this Revel system stacks up, though there are differences, both physically and sonically. Physically, the Revels are somewhat more compact and more elegantly finished, especially with the grille cover left off (as was always the case here since they sounded better that way). The faux wood, textured vinyl finish is a pretty convincing replica of the real thing, though the color is a bit on the orangey side. I was surprised to find that my wife actually preferred the Infinity system's looks. Not me: I thought the Revel system was far more living room-friendly. Sonically, whether because of better cabinet bracing, butyl rubber surrounds, cast baskets, or slightly different "voicing" due to crossover choices, the Oldsmobile, er Revel struck me as being somewhat more refined tonally.
Is it worth spending the extra $500 or so for the Revel version? The instructions are more informative and better written, and given the upscale Revel distribution channel, chances are you'll have a more pleasant retail experience including a better opportunity to listen to the system in pleasant surroundings. On the other hand, the Infinity system can be found online substantially discounted. Basically the choice comes down to whether you prefer an Oldsmobile or a Buick. In this case, I could drive either one. With apologies to Eli and Kevin! Highs and Lows
Highs
Lows
Article Continues: Specifications »
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
